• Today James Lewis of “American Thinker” published a bare-knuckled account of German media that is harsh and takes no prisoners. Excerpts:

    “Germany’s Anti-American Neurosis

    A neurotic obsession is
    like a bone stuck in your throat. You can’t swallow it and you can’t
    spit it out. That is how the German media are hooked on America. It
    doesn’t look quite sane. For Americans, the best web guide to the German media is davids medienkritik. (David’s media critique).

    What
    you find out on this passionately written site, devoted to fighting
    anti-American hatred, is that something very weird is going on between
    the Lowlands and Poland. Something neurotic, in tens of millions of
    minds. And while we know that you can’t always generalize from media
    madness to ordinary people, we also know that the media swing a huge
    weight of influence. So when the German Organs of Propaganda go weird
    and hateful, get ready to worry. Really.

    The examples of obsessive anti-Americanism are all over big German news magazines like Spiegel and Stern. For instance,
    1. The Statue of Liberty with a death’s head instead of the Romantic goddess of liberty.

    2. A close-up of the American flag covered with “BLUT FÜR ÖL”.

    3. George Bush in front of a giant black cross, “A MISSION FROM GOD.”

    4. A horrible Abu Ghraib figure in black garb, headlined “THE TORTURERS OF BAGHDAD.”

    5. A sadistic-looking Rambo muscle man on the cover, emblazoned “OPERATION RAMBO — The  Secret Troops of the USA.”

    This is the mainstream press
    in Germany. In other words, what the American Leftist nutroots make up
    as paranoid fantasies becomes the dominant narrative in Germany. And
    their endless refrain is that American soldiers are no better than
    Nazis.

    This
    is more than just steam-out-of-the-ears dislike of the United States. I
    mean, if you don’t like France or Bosnia, why not ignore those places?
    Just take your vacations in Hawaii. Judging by Davids medienkritik,
    the Germans just can’t let go of us in their collective minds. They are
    hooked on anti-Americanism, and they can’t turn it off. They can’t just
    stop buying Der Spiegel, with its repetetive anti-American slander campaigns. It’s the bone in their throats. 

    The
    European media go for the really nutso tales. The most recent headlines
    shout out that there’s a whole new “trend” in America: Apparently our
    teens are going out at night to kill homeless people. It used to be
    Elvis and hip-hop, and now it’s murdering street people for fun. How’s
    that for nuts? It’s like being stalked by some obsessional maniac
    because your shoes squeak too loud.

    That’s
    another oddity. There are things to criticize about every country in
    the world. Nobody in the United States is completely satisfied, and
    Americans always look for ways to improve ourselves, to solve problems
    and make progress. Nobody is happy with our crime rate, but we are
    always trying to fix it (with considerable success). That’s rational.

    The
    German neurosis isn’t like that. They’re not saying, “we like this
    about America, but we don’t like that.” They just keep pushing
    outrageous slanders that have no basis in reality, and then get übermad
    about us as moral defectives; the next week they come back and repeat
    the process. Then they do it again.  And again. They can’t swallow
    their anti-American fishbone, and they can’t spit it out. (…)”

    Wow. The unsettling part of reading this is that it is that it is difficult to say whether Mr. Lewis is being too general or not about Germans in this piece. It would be nice to say he is being to general – but is he? We know that not all Germans are like this, but it is hard to say that what he has written is entirely untrue – much of it rings of harsh, unpleasant truth. Read the whole thing and decide for yourself.

    This comments section is going to be absolutely fascinating… (Article posted by Ray)

    UPDATE: Author James Lewis has posted this direct response to our comments on his article. Click here.
    He graciously admits his translation errors and has now corrected them in the original. We disagree with him
    on Schroeder – we doubt that Gmaelin’s comments were somehow “arranged”
    in advance or that Schroeder made such a comparison, which Mr. Lewis seems to imply. With all due respect, that sounds like a baseless
    theory. As Mr. Lewis politely
    suggests, we will have to agree to disagree on that. In our opinion,
    the ex-Justice Minister spontaneously uttered her true thoughts out
    loud in the midst of an intense campaign – which is bad enough.

    Otherwise, Mr. Lewis’ article provides an interesting starting
    point for a necessary conversation – he expresses provocative and
    interesting thoughts that need to be addressed
    – his “bone stuck in the throat” analogy is particularly noteworthy
    – we thank him for his prompt response and open willingness to take
    responsibility for errors and look forward to more interesting
    comments…

  • I don’t know whether it’s just me being paranoid…but I get a strong feeling that references to the holocaust are increasingly used in political statements from Germany when actions of the U.S. or Israel are addressed.

    Remember the awful article in Germany’s daily FAZ from feminist Alice Schwarzer, equating Abu Ghraib and Auschwitz? Well, you might say Schwarzer is a left-wing nut and not to be taken seriously. You have a point here.

    Yet here is another example of holocaust labeling techniques in current Germany, this time leveled against Israel from prominent catholic representatives:

    Bishops equate Israel’s actions to Holocaust

    Hours after historic visit to Jerusalem holocaust museum, group of German bishops tour Palestinian Authority, say Israel behaving like Nazis

    “This morning we saw pictures of the Warsaw ghetto at Yad Vashem and this evening we are going to the Ramallah ghetto.” Several hours earlier on Sunday you probably would not have heard German Bishop Gregor Maria Franz Hanke choose such a divisive analogy. But then on Sunday morning he was still in Israel and the rhetoric was considerably different than the one elected by the German Bishops’ Conference once they crossed over in to the Palestinian Authority on Sunday evening.

    The visit of 27 members of the German Bishops’ Conference to Israel included a historic first-time visit to the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial museum in Jerusalem as well as guided tours of sites holy to Christianity and meetings with Christian congregations in Israel and in the Palestinian Authority.

    During their time in Israel the bishops uniformly made moderate and balanced statements, but once in the PA they provided German reporters accompanying them with a plethora of harsh proclamations against Israel. Their criticism received widespread coverage in the German media on Monday.

    While crossing one of the checkpoints into East Jerusalem the Archbishop

  • (By Ray D.)

    They say you can measure a person’s greatness in part by the enemies
    he attracts
    . If the same can be said of blogs, Davids Medienkritik is
    in good company. It seems that our site has been identified as part of
    the “vast right-wing conspiracy” by a particularly deranged and
    troubled individual: Jürgen Cain Külbel – a German lover of
    Hezbollah, Syria, and any anti-American or anti-Israeli conspiracy
    theory he can get his hands on
    .

    Kuelbel openly counts members of Hezbollah, many of whom he knows personally, to his circle of friends.

    Let’s
    start with the basics: Kuelbel, a German karate-enthusiast residing in
    Berlin and former “investigator” for the East German DDR regime, has
    stated publicly that he counts members of Hezbollah, many of whom he knows personally, to his circle of friends.
    He writes for the Syria’s “Al Watan” daily and has produced a book,
    entitled “Mordakte Hariri” claiming that the United States and Israel –
    not Syria – were actually behind the assassination of Rafik Hariri
    . The
    picture below makes plain who his sponsors were and are (note the
    portraits in the background):

    Mr. Kuelbel in Syria hawking copies of his conspiracy book in German and Arabic. Portraits of Syria’s Bashar-al-Assad and his father hang in the background…

    But Kuelbel doesn’t only write for the Syrians. He has written several anti-American tracts for the Austrian “KomInform” Communist site and the far-left “FREACE” website. He has also written for the “Voltaire Network“,
    a French site dedicated to propagating every anti-American, anti-Israel
    conspiracy theory on the planet – including various theories explaining
    how the U.S. government was purportedly behind September 11. In an interview with the “Muslim Markt” website, Kuelbel claimed to know that Osama bin Laden (who he calls
    “USAma bin Laden”) was actually dead when 9/11 took place and that his
    “corpse” has been used all along as a prop by the American government
    to hide the CIA’s alleged role in the attack
    . He even plans to
    write a book dedicated to the topic entitled “Osama bin Laden – World
    Theater with a Corpse.” On his website, Mr. Kuelbel also refers to the
    United States as “Mordamerica” or “Murder America.” 

    Kuelbel’s Cheap Attempts at Character Assassination

    Apparently, before our personal run-in with Mr. Kuelbel, several
    other bloggers bumped heads with Berlin’s Hezbollah-friend. Blog posts revealing Kuelbel’s true character and motives
    sprung up like so many mushrooms over the past year (more here), prompting him to
    view bloggers as part of a vast Neoconservative conspiracy to silence
    him. He responded by meticulously combing the comments sections and
    blogrolls of every blogger he perceived as an enemy, ripping whatever
    he could out of context and twisting it into an instrument of
    defamation and character assassination. Stefan Herre, author of
    Politically Incorrect, was just one target of Kuelbel’s smear tactics.
    In a recent email exchange, Kuelbel asked Erik Svane of No Pasaran “who
    he really was”, implying that perhaps he was a spy for some clandestine organization, a
    remarkable conclusion considering that Erik regularly splashes his
    pictures and videos across the Internet!

    Mr. Kuelbel engages in open character assassination on his site
    and apparently enjoys filing petty “insult” lawsuits as a sort of hobby
    against those who stand up to him – including the author of the blog Liza’s Welt.   

    Needless
    to say, when Davids Medienkritik opposed granting Kuelbel permission to
    use material from our sites to construct his defamatory postings, we came
    in for the same treatment. Kuelbel’s tactic was simple:
    Meticulously comb the subject’s website to find comments, links or
    anything with questionable content and establish guilt by association
    to embarrass the target.
    In our case, the Hezbollah-kid found
    a two-year old link on our dormant German site “Medienkritik Online” to
    “Campo Blog” that we have since removed. We linked it in 2005 after a
    reader suggested it as a good site and removed it from our main site
    within days after receiving complaints and looking through the site
    ourselves. We forgot to remove it from our old German site, which has not been in
    service for years. In his furious effort to attack us, and because he
    could not find anything on our site, Mr. Kuelbel is now desperately
    exploiting a short-lived link on our blogroll to smear us. He claims
    the authors are proponents of pedophilia – and he clearly hopes, in
    some deranged way, to link that to Davids Medienkritik in a twisted effort to discredit or embarrass our site. To even acknowledge
    that charge is beneath our dignity. We simply wanted to point out this
    obvious lie to clear the record.

    The fact that Mr. Kuelbel has chosen this despicable means of
    character assassination is a testament to his true character. He is obviously a very sick, paranoid individual drowning in a sea of convoluted conspiracy theories. And this
    much is clear: We are by no means the first and not likely the last to
    encounter Kuelbel’s ugly attacks. In that sense, let this
    posting serve as warning to any and all who would cross paths with
    Jürgen Cain Külbel: He is someone who has repeatedly lied, distorted
    and twisted facts to support his worldview and slander his enemies. 

    Let us conclude with this: We hadn’t planned to write anything about
    Mr. Kuelbel since his site has no traffic – getting into a pissing
    contest with this skunk was frankly something we saw as not worth our
    time and effort. But when he persisted in publishing his disgusting
    allegations of guilt by association, we saw no choice but to stand up
    to the little Hezbollah-hack
    . In our case, we found no need to twist or distort the facts. Simply
    telling the truth about Juergen Cain Kuelbel is more than enough to
    utterly discredit him and the ugly propaganda and defamation he spews
    .

    Endnote: Needless to say, Mr. Kuelbel has gone out
    of his way to reach out and attack our site, our character and our
    friends. If any of our readers would like to contact him to let him
    know what they think of that or of his many opinions, he can be reached
    at: cainkuelbel@t-online.de

    If any of our readers have additional information that they would like to add about Kuelbel, please feel free to email us or post in our comments section. More at No Pasaran. Blogger Telegehirn has more in German on Kuelbel’s Stasi-like smear tactics.

  • (By Ray D.)

    SPIEGEL ONLINE has returned to its old modus operandi. It goes something like this: First, find an extreme and unusual act of grotesque violence or some other extreme form of social deviancy related to the United States. Second, extrapolate the incident onto the entire nation. Earlier cases include: The New York power outage. SPIEGEL reacted with a sensational cover accompanied by articles insisting that the United States was a faltering superpower with a third rate power grid. Then there was Abu Ghraib, which SPIEGEL exploited two years after the fact to proclaim the the incident was “America’s Shame” and represented “torture in the name of freedom.” The magazine also labeled US troops “mercenaries” and “torturers.” And let’s not forget that story on unemployment in Kannapolis, North Carolina (where unemployment is actually dramatically lower than in most of Germany) used to paint the United States as a land of predatory capitalism and heartless Social Darwinism.

    The latest installment is an article entitled: ‘Brutal “Trendsport” in the USA: Teenagers Hunt the Homeless‘. That’s right folks: According to SPIEGEL ONLINE, it’s the latest hip trend sweeping the United States. Young people can’t get enough of this new sport: Everywhere you look, homeless people are being mercilessly beaten by roving bands of drunk and high teenagers. The bodies are piling up left and right and the hospitals are overflowing. Right.

    To prove that brutalizing homeless people is in fact a new “Trendsport” in America, SPIEGEL ONLINE notes that, according to National Coalition of the Homeless, there were 122 attacks, 20 of them fatal, against homeless individuals last year in a nation of 300 million. This is presented as more evidence that America is the home of a brutal, heartless capitalism where rich, dope-smoking teenagers prey on the downtrodden and oppressed underclass.   

    But wait. If we are going to follow that logic and those standards, then beating and killing the homeless has long been a “Trendsport” in Germany as well. Take these examples:

    • Tageszeitung reported on January 17, 2007 that a 45 year old homeless man was attacked by two young men in Hannover (reportedly the second such attack in the new year alone in Hannover!) The man sustained injuries to the face and ribs.
    • In December 2006, a homeless man was beaten down in the Prenzlauer Berg section of Berlin by a 23 year old who filmed the incident.
    • In 2003, eight German youth, aged 12 to 19, beat a homeless man to death in a forest near Neulussheim, Germany.

    The image “https://medienkritik.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/johannbabies.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

    Johann Babies, a German homeless man beaten to death in 2003 by German youth aged 12 to 19.

    These cases listed above took ten minutes to Google. There are undoubtedly further recent examples of beatings and murders of German homeless. Suffice it to say that such attacks represent neither a trend nor a sport in either Germany or the USA. They are the senseless acts of deranged individuals that in no way reflect on the larger state of either nation. Unfortunately, SPIEGEL ONLINE has again chosen to vilify the United States in the most crude manner by implying that these incidents reflect the society at large. Nowhere does the publication bother to mention that the American people spend unprecedented amounts of time and money (through both the public and private sectors) to help the homeless at home and abroad.

    Frankly put: The “Trendsport” article is both an ugly smear of the United States and an unabashed example of trashy German media hypocrisy of the worst sort. Here again, German media have demonstrated that it is far more convenient and comfortable to vilify World-Scapegoat-America than it is to look in the mirror at the many social, economic and political problems that plague Germans in their own backyard. The only surprise about this piece? That they didn’t find a way to blame it all on Bush.

    Endnote: If their is any “Trendsport” to speak of in all of this, it is the tireless anti-Americanism that has grown to disease-like proportions in German media including SPIEGEL ONLINE and among the consumers of this form of media. The fact that SPIEGEL has published so many articles and covers like this is a clear indicator that Hate-America is an all too popular “Trendsport” in Germany.

    UPDATE: It is relatively difficult to find statistics on violence against the homeless in Germany. According to the Berliner Tenants’ Association website, at least 20 homeless people were murdered in Germany in 2000. That’s the same number of fatalities reported by SPIEGEL to have occurred in the US in 2006. If anyone can locate official government statistics on this for Germany, please point them out in our comments section.

    UPDATE #2: Several commenters correctly point to another trend at SPIEGEL ONLINE: Like so much of their recent “reporting” on the United States, this article is little more than a regurgitated translation of English-language media excerpts that fit the magazine’s ideological bill. In this specific case, it was a CNN report.

  • (By Ray D.)

    In a recent online piece for the Washington Post, German journalist Thomas Kleine-Brockhoff of Die Zeit points out the disturbing fact that many Germans feel more threatened by the United States than Iran. He points to a glut of hate-America, lunatic-fringe comments on his publication’s website, yet claims that Die Zeit is “squarely middle-of-the-road” and “read by educated people.” Mr. Brockhoff’s glaring inability to admit the obvious leftist-bias of his publication is matched only by his audacious unwillingness to acknowledge the German media’s far-reaching role in spreading anti-Americanism in Germany. He writes:

    “Maybe we are getting a good look at anti-Americanism. Surely, Germany
    has quite a bit of that. The nationalist right loves to talk about
    “authenticity” and “roots” as opposed to American “shallowness” and
    “materialism”. The left is proud of its history of “anti-capitalism”
    and “anti-imperialism”. The United States is seen as the premier
    perpetrator of these crimes. Surely, Germans will have to work through
    these stereotypes –- and historically they have. But the undeniable
    anti-Americanism in Germany and all of Europe has also become a
    convenient excuse for Americans. The argument goes: if it is all about
    who we are instead of what we do, then why care?

    Traditionally, the way America conducted itself in the world
    influenced foreign audiences. America was able to change the “balance
    of power” in foreign debates. Certainly, America has again changed
    foreign lands over the past five or six years. Except, this time it has
    acted much to its own detriment.

    Some argue that America does not explain its policies and motives
    well enough and that this is why the country is hated. This is a
    favorite claim from those who do not want to change policy course.
    These people fool themselves into believing that expanding a White
    House spin and communication campaign around the globe will change
    perceptions. It is more likely that Frances Fukuyama of Johns Hopkins
    University has it right.

    During an event on Capitol Hill today he said that rebuilding
    America’s reputation around the world will take “the better part of a
    generation. And it cannot be done as long as “American tanks roll
    through a major Arab capitol”. And I might add: there will be little
    global legitimacy for the U.S. as long as it is seen as a country that
    routinely tortures its prisoners.

    That fact ordinary citizens of European liberal democracies feel
    more threatened by America than Iran (or Putin’s Russia) is not just
    because of a lapse of judgment that can easily be dismissed. It is
    cause for alarm.
    “

    How nuanced. Of course. It is current American policy that is to blame. But how does that explain German anti-Americanism at other times in history? Further, Mr. Brockhoff obviously lacks the moral integrity and the downright honesty to admit that his colleagues in the German media have tirelessly fanned the flames of anti-American bigotry and ignorance – particularly over the past five years. There is nothing any administration could conceivably do in the face of a media elite determined to present it in a negative light with little regard for facts or balance.

    The image “https://medienkritik.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/covers1.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

    Could this sort of non-stop hate-America reporting have anything to do with German anti-Americanism Mr. Brockhoff or are you too dishonest to admit it exists? What can Americans possibly do to end the hate spewing from German media? (Take a look through our archives for more examples.)  

    Mr. Brockhoff – who fancies himself a tough and fair reporter – would rather continue to exist in a cocoon of denial  – in a fantasy land – and hope that the language barrier and lack of interest for Germany in the United States will continue to conceal the very ugly truth about his profession. He has become too much a stooge of his editors to speak truth to power. Mr. Brockhoff obviously lacks the intellectual honesty to admit that the German media is a major part of the problem. At the very least he could drop the Oberlehrer-like tone of the wise truth-teller preaching down to his so-called American friends.

    Mr. Brockhoff misses a further key point. Namely, that American’s opinions of Germany and Europe – especially those of informed decision-makers – will likely take a generation to recover from the feckless politics and hateful media propaganda spewing forth from Europe’s capitols – and that is something he ought to worry about as well. American leaders are growing increasingly reluctant to give their European partners the benefit of the doubt. Blogs like ours will continue to tirelessly expose and document the hate and hypocrisy coming out of the European press.

    This much is certain: Germany’s shameless trade with Iraq, Sudan and Iran has not gone unnoticed. Europe’s cowardly appeasement of Saddam Hussein and other dictators has not gone unnoticed. Germany’s unwillingness to deploy troops in harm’s way when it really matters in Afghanistan has not gone unnoticed. Gerhard Schroeder’s incredibly corrupt, poodle-like obedience to his Gazprom masters in the Kremlin has not gone unnoticed. And Mr. Brockhoff’s – and the German media’s – unwillingness to come to terms with the pervasive and undeniable anti-Americanism that plagues his profession will not go unnoticed. If he is so worried about America’s image in the world, perhaps he ought to take a very long and hard look in the mirror. Tend your own garden first Mr. Brockhoff – before you tell Americans how they must tend theirs with your hollow – populist policy prescriptions.   

    To conclude, we suggest our readers look at this recent piece by Andrei Markovits, which offers a far more honest and comprehensive assessment of European anti-Americanism, it’s roots and current implications. Here an excerpt:

    “The Bush administration’s policies have catapulted global and
    Western European anti-Americanism into overdrive. But to understand
    that overdrive, we need to analyze the conditions under which this kind
    of shift into high gear could occur. Western Europeans’ unconditional
    rejection of and legitimate outrage over abusive and irresponsible
    American policies — not to mention massive human-rights violations à la
    Abu Ghraib, Guantánamo, secret CIA cells — rest on a substantial
    sediment of hatred toward, disdain for, and resentment of America that
    has a long tradition in Europe and has flourished apart from those or
    any other policies.

    Ambivalence, antipathy, and resentment toward and about the United
    States have made up an important component of European culture since
    the American Revolution, thus way before America became the world’s
    “Mr. Big” — the proverbial 800-pound gorilla — and a credible rival to
    Europe’s main powers, particularly Britain and France. In recent years,
    following the end of the cold war, and particularly after 9/11,
    ambivalence in some quarters has given way to unambiguous hostility.
    Animosity toward the United States has migrated from the periphery and
    become a respectable part of the European mainstream.

    Negative sentiments and views have been driven not only — or even primarily — by what the United States does,
    but rather by an animus against what Europeans have believed that
    America is. While the politics, style, and discourse of the Bush
    terms — and of President Bush as a person — have undoubtedly
    exacerbated anti-American sentiment among Europeans and fostered a
    heretofore unmatched degree of unity between elite and mass opinion in
    Europe, they are not anti-Americanism’s cause. Indeed, a change to a
    center-left administration in Washington, led by a Democratic
    president, would not bring about its abatement, let alone its
    disappearance.
    “

    Read the whole thing.

  • (By Ray Drake)

    Those tricky Republicans. It’s a good thing we have the German media to uncover their tricks. Recently, SPIEGEL ONLINE caught them red-handed in the tricky jar. The online magazine discovered that Republican blockage of the non-binding Iraq resolution in the Senate was extremely tricky. And, oh, by the way: President Bush is “under growing pressure” for the five-billionth time since he took office. It doesn’t seem to matter what the situation is – if we follow the German media – Bush is perpetually under “massive and growing pressure.”

    Now back to the “tricks” of those oh-so-tricky Senate Republicans. SPIEGEL ONLINE writes:

    “Tricks in the Senate

    The news put further pressure on George W. Bush. The front against his Iraq policy is growing. Yesterday, the Republicans did, in fact, hinder a resolution in the US Senate against Bush’s Iraq policy and the deployment of further troops. However only barely and with tricks: 60 Senators had to vote yes in order to break off the week-long debate over Bush’s Iraq plans and over that critical resolution that decides for a change of course that already passed the House of Representatives on Friday. But in the end it did not suffice. 56 Senators voted yes, 34 no.

    “Filibuster” is what this game is called in the US Senate, with which the minority can put the brakes on the majority.”

    Interesting. When the Republicans ran Congress and minority Democrats repeatedly employed the same tactic, it was never described as deceit or trickery by SPIEGEL ONLINE. When Democrats blocked the nomination of John Bolton, it was described by SPON as a “power struggle” between determined, stubborn Democrats and a “Schlappe” or defeat for Bush.

    SPIEGEL ONLINE’s very different handling of the identical legislative phenomenon openly exposes the pervasive bias that plagues the publication, making it difficult if not impossible for its readers to end up as anything but misinformed.

    Bottom line: The “nuanced” world of SPIEGEL “journalism” is often starkly black and white: Democrats = Good;  Republicans = Evil Tricky. Put another way: You are either left-of-center or you are against us.

    Endnote: This past Sunday, ZDF heute Journal explained that the Democrats “could not get the two-thirds” majority they needed to end debate. Hmmmm. Let me get my calculator out… 60/100 = 2/3?? Either the “Amerika-Experten” at ZDF can’t do basic division or they simply don’t know what they are talking about.

  • For German politics and the German media, the U.S. and in particular U.S. President Bush are the default villains of environmental policy. Next to the bible, “Kyoto” is the cherished vision for a better world, in which humans, penguins and polar bears, to name a few beneficiaries, will live together in perfect natural harmony. All that stands between the paradise and the present are Bush’s neocons who simply refuse to accept the consensus view of science.

    Imagine, then, the surprise for the German audience generated by a speech of Kurt Volker, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs of the U.S. State Department. The speech was given on Feb 12, 2007, at a meeting of the German Marshall Fund.
    Excerpts:

    Now, I know there is a deeply held view among many in Europe that the U.S. Government doesn’t get it. That we don’t care about climate change, that we are doing nothing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and that Europe, while perhaps not perfect, is doing a far better job of tackling the issue than the United States. This proposition–no matter how simple, no matter how widely held, and no matter how much it fits a pop-culture “blame-the-United States” paradigm–is completely wrong, on every point. (…)

    Let me start first with the data, because it is important to have the facts on the table. No question: The United States is the world’s largest emitter of CO2. Everybody in the room knows this. But this fact says no more about the United States, than the fact that Germany leads Europe in emissions says about Germany.

    The United States is number one in greenhouse gas emissions primarily because it is the number one economy in the world. With 5% of the world’s population we produce 25% of global wealth. And despite being relatively clean and green, Germany leads Europe in emissions, because it is Europe’s largest economy. Our emissions are not out of line with the size of our economy. And it’s worth noting: the International Energy Agency is forecasting that China, with a smaller economy, is expected to surpass U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 2009.

    More important than current emissions is the trend line. What is actually happening to emissions? Are they being reduced? This, after all, is what Kyoto is supposed to address.

    According to data from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, from 2000-2004–the most recent period for which we have good, comparative data–U.S. greenhouse gas emissions increased by 1.3 percent. This is an increase, but a very modest increase. The EU-25, on the other hand, increased collective emissions by 2.1 percent.

    And, no, this is not because the new EU members added since the 2004 expansion run dirtier economies than the previous 15 members, and this then bumps up the numbers. Actually, the new members have the opposite effect. Those nations–by moving away

  • Say it ain’t so! This is so sad… Locusts cutting jobs to maximize profits!

    However – this time the locusts are from Germany:

    DaimlerChrysler to cut 13,000 Chrysler jobs, close 1 plant

    DaimlerChrysler AG said it is cutting 13,000 jobs in Chrysler and is closing its Newark assembly plant under a turnaround plan that aims to generate 3.5 bln eur positive impact in profits by 2009.

    And guess what? DaimlerChrysler shares are … up almost 8 % (as of 8pm German time, Feb. 14)!! .

    What will the German media say? Of course, they’ll be all up in arms, as they were in 2005, when GM discussed job cuts at Germany’s Opel plant. (1, 2)

    Or not.

    After all, Chrysler job losses are Germany’s win. Mercedes is doing just fine and doesn’t want to endanger German jobs by financing Chrysler deficits.

    Of course, that’s the way capitalism works: allocating money where prospects are best. Even German journalists understand that. Except, of course, if the job losses are in Germany and the investor is an American company.

  • Just another reason for the Americans to thank the European “friends” in the Austrian government. High-powered 50 caliber rifles sold to Iran “to fight drug smugglers” by the Austrian firm Steyr-Mannlicher are now killing US troops in Iraq, and the Austrian government expressly approved the sale in 2005 despite U.S. protests, describing the deal as “unimpeachable”:

    Report: Austrian rifles supplied to Iran have found their way to Iraqi insurgents

    LONDON: Sophisticated rifles supplied to Iran by an Austrian arms company in 2006 are finding their way into the hands of Iraqi insurgents, a British newspaper reported Tuesday.

    American troops have recovered more than 100 “Steyr .50 HS” rifles in Iraq, part of an Austrian consignment of 800 such weapons delivered to Iran over American protests that they could be given to insurgents, the Daily Telegraph reported.

    The Austrian government approved the sale of the rifles, made by precision weapons maker Steyr Mannlicher GmbH, after it concluded in 2004 that they would be used to fight narcotics smugglers. (source)

    Just more evidence of the non-violent superiority of the European way-of-life. Trade anything to anyone. Who cares if they are genocidal thugs or out to build a nuke or wipe Israel off the map? Who cares if they use the rifles to kill Americans? This keeps Austria’s unemployment down. Don’t you just love pacifism?

    The Austrian “statesmen” most responsible for approving the deal. From left to right: Former Chancellor Wolfgang Schuessel, Interior Minister Guenther Platter, Foreign Minister Ursula Plassnik, Ex-Interior Minister Ernst Strasser.

    By the way: Where’s Michael Moore when you need him? Here’s a documentary idea: Take the family members of the American soldiers killed by Austrian rifles in Iraq and confront former Austrian Chancellor Wolfgang Schuessel and ask him how any sane human being could have approved shipping hundreds of these killing machines to Iran. Were the measly profits involved worth the potential damage to US-Austrian relations? More here…

    Endnote: We strongly suggest our American readers contact the press office at the Austrian Embassy with their thoughts and opinions on this:

    Embassy Telephone: 1-202-895-6700 (listen to the recording and then press 1 and then press 4 for the press department – you may be asked to record your message)
    Embassy E-mail: austroinfo@austria.org

    The members of the then Schuessel cabinet most responsible for approving the sale can be reached here:

    Ex-Austrian Chancellor Wolfgang Schuessel: wolfgang.schuessel@parlament.gv.at

    Austrian Interior Minister Günther Platter (Defense Minister at the time of the deal): matthias.wechner@bmi.gv.at

    Austrian Foreign Minister Ursula Plassnik: kabbm@bmaa.gv.at

    Ex-Austrian Interior Minister Ernst Strasser: Click here to send an email.

    You can also contact the firm that produced and sold the rifles to Iran. Apparently, Steyr-Mannlicher boss Wolfgang Fuerlinger has gone on the record as saying that Iran is “a market of the future” and that “more is coming” in the way of business with Iran for his firm:

    Email: office@steyr-mannlicher.com
    Phone: +43 (0) 7252 896 0
    Fax: +43 (0) 7252 896 53

    STEYR MANNLICHER GmbH & Co KG
    Postfach 1000
    Ramingtal 46
    4442 Kleinraming | Austria

    Normally we ask our readers to keep their comments civil and respectful. In this case, we understand if that is difficult…

  • John Rosenthal presents the latest developments in the Al-Masri case: the Masri assault and the investigation into the four journalists who published BKA leaks connecting Masri to the 9/11 investigation.

    Al-Masri – you will remember – is considered the innocent victim of a sinister CIA abduction plot. His case led to uncontrolled outburst of anti-Americanism in the German media. John Rosenthal:

    According to his well-known account, Masri, following a quarrel with his wife, is supposed, on the spur of the moment, to have decided to spend New Years in the strife-ridden Balkan country. Just how an unemployed person — and one with a wife and four children no less — was able to afford acting on such a whim is not obvious. Adding to the mystery, Masri is reported to have been carrying several thousand euros in cash when he was picked up by Macedonian authorities at the Serbian-Macedonian border. (…)

    (The) Hamburg Public Prosecutors Office confirmed that it was investigating four journalists — one from the Financial Times Deutschland and three from the weekly Stern — suspected of “aiding and abetting in the betrayal of state secrets”: namely, pertaining to Khaled Al-Masri. As touched upon in my previous WPW report on Masri, in September the two publications, citing a confidential memorandum of Germany’s Federal Office for Criminal Investigations (BKA), revealed that Masri had been “known as an adherent of a fundamentalist line in Islam and a proponent of military jihad” since “at the latest October 2003.” October 2003 was three months before Masri was seized by the Macedonian border police and allegedly turned over to American agents.

    Read it all.