• An absolutely fascinating piece appeared yesterday in the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. This is required reading. (registration required – excerpts below) 

    It seems that the mainstream press (with a few notable exceptions – the Wall Street Journal’s John Fund for example) is only now beginning to understand and describe a phenomenon that we have documented on this site for over three years.

    Excerpts:

    “NEW YORK: Does the United States, the real country, exist in the French mind, or has America become a kind of Gallic fantasy, a dark specter to be deployed for political ends, a sort of ultimate negative against which the qualities of France shine?

    That question may seem outlandish. The web of connections between the two countries is intricate. In general it is easier to fantasize about the unknown than the known. But the United States seems curiously impervious to French knowledge because the French prefer to preserve the country in the realm of the imaginary. (…)

    Being the anti- France, the United States, it often seems, cannot be seen for what it is. So freighted is America with meaning, it ceases to be visible. It becomes an abstraction shaped by prejudice rather than a country intelligible through experience. It serves a purpose at the price of being severed from itself.

    These reflections stirred on reading an eloquent example of Gallic delusion: the statement just published by Ségolène Royal’s Socialist Party about Nicolas Sarkozy, her chief opponent in the French presidential election. This 87-page work amounts to a relentless exercise in Sarkozy-bashing through his depiction as that incarnation of menace: a card-carrying crypto-American.

    Entitled “The Worrying ‘Quiet Rupture’ of Mr. Sarkozy,” and displayed on Parti-socialiste.fr, the party’s home page, the work begins by asking: “Is France ready to vote in 2007 for an American neo-conservative carrying a French passport?”

    That gets the ball rolling. The party’s core argument runs roughly as follows: America is bad, Sarkozy is its agent, ergo he is dangerous. The publication really has little more to say about Royal’s center-right rival.

    One chapter is entitled “Nicolas Sarkozy or the Clone of Bush.” A memorable sentence, among many such gems, says: “Yesterday Europe was importing jeans, coke, rock ‘n’ roll and cinema from the United States. Now Nicolas Sarkozy is proposing that we import God!” (…)

    The Socialist Party portrait of American society evokes a place rotten to the core, stricken by obesity and a high murder rate, driving exploited workers to the limits of endurance, imprisoning 2 percent of its population, engaged in a failed affirmative action experiment that has only “made a racial issue of all problems,” and beset by an ominous religious fervor.

    The real U.S. unemployment rate, it is preposterously suggested, is not 5.1 percent, but 9 percent. America under Bush has no interest in international law because its sole international aim is “the promotion of the American empire.”

    The death penalty, torture, renditions, secret prisons, short or non-existent vacations, absent or expensive health care, a Darwinian labor market and the worship of “the individualist entrepreneur” complete this happy picture of France’s ally.

    “It is in this,” the Socialists conclude triumphantly, “that Nicolas Sarkozy sees the future of French society!”

    There are a couple of problems with all this. The first is that although some of the individual claims have some merit — a health care system that leaves more than 40 million people without insurance is a bad system — the composite picture is wildly distorted, a collage of doom and gloom.

    The America in which French companies from Accor to Business Objects prosper, which grows and creates jobs in ways France can only dream of, which is restlessly self- transforming rather than irksomely self-obsessed, which has assured the postwar European security from which France and the European Union have benefited — this United States is nowhere to be seen.”

    Indeed. For many in Europe, America is a dark fantasy constructed of prejudice and political bias with little if any connection to reality. And that leads us to a key insight: It is the media establishment that has played a crucial role in creating and fostering that dark fantasy! A very significant and influential segment of the media, driven by profit, greed and ideology, has consistently sought to stoke and exacerbate the prejudices and biases which Mr. Cohen so aptly describes. This is the fundamental problem and issue with which we have confronted our audience for as long as we have worked on this blog.

    The negative connotations and knee-jerk reactions that accompany the German phrase “amerikanische Verhältnisse” are symptomatic of the same problem in Germany. Again, read the entire piece. (Posted by Ray D.)

  • (By Ray D.)

    Davids Medienkritik just added a gem to our collection of signed books. The
    latest edition is “Hurra, wir kapitulieren!” (Hurrah, We
    Capitulate!) by prominent journalist, author and blogger Henryk Broder. I was
    lucky enough to attend a live reading and book signing at the German embassy
    in Washington, D.C. and had a chance to speak briefly with the author himself.

    The book itself is a must-read for anyone interested in
    German political culture. It addresses the pervasive political correctness that
    has led many in Europe and around the world to adopt an attitude of appeasement
    and blind do-gooderism towards Islamic extremists while seeking to pin all the
    world’s problems on Israel and the United States. He discusses the very real
    and growing synergy of ideas and shared objectives between Islamists and the
    far left. The book is highly funny, sarcastic and sobering all at the same
    time. We don’t often recommend books, but “Hurrah, wir kapitulieren!”
    is simply too good to ignore.

    Endnote: Order “Hurrah, wir kapitulieren!”
    here
    .

  • Remember Porsche CEO Wendelin Wiedeking’s holier-than-you attitude vis-a-vis the US? Wiedeking’s position – which is probably held by a majority of German managers and certainly by practically all German journalists – is that “anglo-saxon” capitalism is an inferior economic strategy as compared to the German “social market economy”.

    Then, of course, is the Kyoto debate in Germany, with wild accusations against supposedly anti-environmental policies of Bush and his neo-cons. How admirably and favorably the German philosophy of sustainability compares to these stinking non-caring Americans! Think Schroeder.

    And now this:

    Porsche warns of emissions war

    Porsche’s chief executive on Friday warned of an impending business war between Germany on one side and France and Italy when he said plans by the European Commission to limit carbon dioxide emissions were an attack on German luxury carmakers.

    The outspoken comments by Wendelin Wiedeking at the sports carmaker’s annual meeting underline the nervousness of German carmakers, all of which are a long way above the proposed limits and are much more threatened than the likes of France’s Renault and Peugeot and Italy’s Fiat.

    “It is an attack on BMW, Mercedes, Audi and ourselves … This is a business war in Europe. We will fight,” Mr Wiedeking told shareholders.

    All four companies produce large luxury cars compared with the smaller ones of Renault, Peugeot and Fiat. In an extreme case, industry executives believe strict limits would threaten the existence of luxury carmakers.

    The European Commission says it is committed to cutting vehicle emissions to 120 grammes per kilometre by 2012, although it has failed to agree a common line on how to achieve this. Porsche’s average emissions are more than double this target. (…)

    Mr Wiedeking’s warning came as Porsche reported a six-fold rise in first-half pre-tax profits swelled by a number of one-off effects related to its large investment in VW. Porsche has spent €4bn ($5bn) buying a 27.4 per cent stake in the bigger German carmaker, and in the six months to the end of January marked up the value of its VW shares by €520m.

    It also made a similar amount from share price hedging connected to VW, which, together with sums it made last year, mean it has earned more than €1bn from the policy.

    In spite of a 3 per cent fall in revenue to €3bn, Mr Wiedeking said underlying profitability in its core automobile business had risen. Preliminary pre-tax profit rose from €278m to €1.45bn.

    Hmm..profits seem to be pretty close to the heart of Mr. Wiedeking, definitely closer than environmental concerns. As to the ecological insensivity of Americans, you will find this chart of interest:

    Development of particle limits for Diesel cars in g per km

    Also of interest: a comparison of fuel efficiency and CO2 emissions of several Mercedes-Benz models for the U.S. and Germany (source):

    (liter per kilometer / CO2 g/km)

    S500
    U.S.: 11.2 / 264 g/km
    Germany: 12.1 / 292 g/km

    E 320 T
    U.S.: 9.1 / 214
    Germany: 10.6 / 254

    SL 500
    U.S.: 11.0 / 259
    Germany: 12.1 / 292

    Conclusion: the leading German luxury car maker sells cleaner and more fuel efficient models in the U.S. than in Germany! Why-oh-why?

    BUT BUSH DIDN’T SIGN KYOTO!!!!

    Update: What a coincidence! Benny Peiser from the Liverpool John Moores University headlines his CCNet newsletter: IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID: GERMANY TAKES UP FIGHT AGAINST EU EMISSION PLANS.

  • The hanging of Saddam Hussein met with widespread disapproval in the German media. The buzzwords were “cruel” (grausam) and “inhumane” (inhuman).

    It is interesting to ponder what fate Saddam might have endured in the hands of contemporary German judges and/or politicians.

    Most likely, Saddam would have gotten a gentle slap on the wrist. At best.

    As was the case for another 20th century madman: Erich Honecker, the former dictator of communist East Germany. Admittedly, in comparison to Saddam, Honecker’s crimes were not quite as large in magnitude, but he was responsible for several hundred deaths of those who tried to escape East Germany. Also, of course, he was running a police state that made life miserable for millions. Saddam probably viewed Honecker as an equal.

    In 1993, Erich Honecker’s trial found a quick and surprising end, shortly after it had started. Honecker was diagnosed with cancer:

    And then suddenly he was scot-free, bundled into an official limousine and speeded to the airport. A day later he was in Chile, in the bosom of his exiled family. The Berlin court had heard the appeal to end the “cruelty” of the trial of Erich Honecker and made its favorable decision hurriedly, precluding any appeal to a higher court; the villain made a quick getaway.

    How advantegeous for Honecker! Saddam would have killed for this outcome…

    As it turned out, Honecker had another year and a half to live happily in the favorable climate of Chile, together with his wife Margot (which probably was the only drawback for him).

    In contemporary Iraq, though, Honecker would have met with a different fate. For Davids Medienkritik, Alexander Leonard has visualized the most likely consequence:

    The cruel and inhume fate of Erich Honecker
    if he had fallen into the hands of Iraqi judges.

    I know of a few East Germans who would have loved to see him hanged, rather than living the relaxed life of a retiree in Chile. For them, this image might be at least a small consolation…

  • One of our readers wrote in with this:

    “You may be interested in this article at Focus titled “U.S.
    Kids are Fat and Lazy.”  This article represents the core of the
    anti-Americanism that permeates all levels of the German media. They pick only
    negative stories and present them in a mocking, sneering tone.”

    Focus: “US Kids are Fat and Lazy“

    It must have taken a lot of professionalism, class and journalistic integrity for the headline writer to come up with that. Just another day of ugly stereotypes in German media. Our reader’s comments really say it all. (Posted by Ray D.; Hattip Bret K.)

  • A must read from John Rosenthal:

    What exactly is the German foreign intelligence service, the BND, doing in Iraq? Although the public has had occasion to be aware of the BND presence, up until now most will have been led to believe that the BND has been “quietly” cooperating with American and coalition authorities. Even more skeptical observers will have assumed that it is at least not cooperating with America’s enemies in the country. But a photograph published earlier this month in the German weekly Stern provides disturbing evidence that it is doing precisely that. 

    Read it all…

  • This is a projection of the population of European countries for 2050, taken from a publication of the German statistical bureau destatis (p. 16):

    Germany’s population will shrink from its current level of 82,5 million by roughly 10 percent until 2050. In addition, the age composition of the German population will change. While the current share of the 60+ group is already comparatively high at 25 %, it will rise to one third of the population in 2050. Conversally, the share of the “up to 20” group will fall from 21 % to 15 % (p. 17).

    The average number of children per woman in Germany is 1,37 (2004) (p. 14). Of course, this is an average across all population groups. Women from immigrant families are substantially more fertile than German women; the reproduction rate of German women alone will be considerably lower than 1,37, probably less than 1,20 (my guess).

    Within a few decades, Germany will face grave consequences of these demographic shifts:

    • The large group of retirees and pensioners – which will be mostly Christians – will have to be supported by a work force that is smaller than today, with a substantial share of Muslims. Already today, the German pay-as-you-go retirement system comes under heavy criticism.
    • The German elites, which today and for the foreseeable are overwhelmingly non-immigrant Christians, will face a population with a substantial share of immigrant non-Christians. A clash of values within seems inevitable.

    I am not so sure whether the cherished German social welfare model will survive this clash…

  • Certainly a memorable moment:

    Two black coaches are front and center

    (…) Lovie Smith became the first black head coach to make it all the way to the NFL’s marquee game yesterday when his Chicago Bears won the NFC championship. About four hours later, his pal and mentor, Tony Dungy, joined him there when his Indianapolis Colts took the AFC title. For the first time in the big game’s 41-year history, not one, but two black head coaches will be on the sidelines. “It means a lot,” Dungy said after a 38-34 victory over the New England Patriots. “I’m very proud to represent African-American coaches.”

    And here’s the headline of Germany’s daily WELT:

    Super Bowl as Victory Against Apartheid

    BTW, number of politicians with an immigration background* in Angela Merkel’s cabinet:

    None. Zip. Zero. Nil. Nought.

    Number of German state presidents (Länder-Ministerpräsidenten) with an immigration background*:

    None. Zip. Zero. Nil. Nought.

    Quick: name any three top politicians in Germany with an immigration background*! Or: name any Muslim top politician in Germany!

    Anyone? Hello??

    Where’s the victory against apartheid, racism and religious discrimination in Germany?

    (* Of course, immigration from the Netherlands, France, and other Western European countries doesn’t count here.)

  • (By Paul13)

    Wem die oberflächliche Berichterstattung deutscher Massenmedien, die Bush’s Rede zur neuen Irakstrategie im wesentlichen als Truppenverstärkung darzustellen versuchen, etwas seltsam vorkommt, kann sich glücklicherweise an kompetenterer Stelle über ein paar hierzulande – natürlich rein “zufällig” – übergangene, aber weit wichtigere Punkte des amerikanischen Strategiewechsels informieren. Weit entfernt davon, nur Schadensbegrenzung zu betreiben, scheint Bush nämlich wieder in die Offensive gehen zu wollen und den Kampf endlich – wie schon seit Jahren von neokonservativer Seite angemahnt, von den Realpolitikern aber immer wieder ausgebremst – auch auf die ausländischen

  • Davids Medienkritik just added a gem to our collection of signed books. The latest edition is “Hurra, wir kapitulieren!” (Hurrah, We Capitulate!) by prominent journalist, author and blogger Henryk Broder. I was lucky enough to attend a live reading and book signing at the German embassy in Washington, D.C. and had a chance to speak briefly with the author himself.

    The book itself is a must-read for anyone interested in German political culture. It addresses the pervasive political correctness that has led many in Europe and around the world to adopt an attitude of appeasement and blind do-gooderism towards Islamic extremists while seeking to pin all the world’s problems on Israel and the United States. He discusses the very real and growing synergy of ideas and shared objectives between Islamists and the far left. The book is highly funny, sarcastic and sobering all at the same time. We don’t often recommend books, but “Hurrah, wir kapitulieren!” is simply too good to ignore.

    Endnote: Order “Hurrah, wir kapitulieren!” here.